Answered

Critics maintain that the 9/11 Commission was established to investigate the attacks but that it
O a. had neither the expertise nor the capability to reform intelligence gathering
O b. failed to thoroughly investigate federal intelligence failures
O c. overstepped its bounds by implicating friendly foreign governments
O d. had done little to look beyond the "usual suspects" and investigate newer groups



Answer :

GinnyAnswer
I'd be happy to help with that question. Here is a clear and concise answer: The 9/11 Commission was established to investigate the attacks, but critics maintain that it had neither the expertise nor the capability to reform intelligence gathering (option a). This criticism suggests that the commission may not have had the necessary skills or resources to make significant improvements in intelligence gathering processes following the attacks. Another valid criticism is that the commission failed to thoroughly investigate federal intelligence failures (option b). This indicates that some critics believe the commission did not delve deep enough into the failures within the intelligence community that may have contributed to the 9/11 attacks. It's essential to consider these criticisms to understand the limitations and areas of improvement for investigative bodies like the 9/11 Commission.

Other Questions