Answer :
Certainly! When a researcher is interested in studying the prospects of a particular political party in an urban area, they should prefer using a Questionnaire as the tool for the study.
Here's why a questionnaire is a suitable choice:
1. Scalability: Questionnaires can be distributed to a large number of people in the urban area, allowing the researcher to gather a wide range of opinions and perspectives efficiently.
2. Anonymity: Respondents can provide their opinions anonymously through a questionnaire, which can lead to more honest and candid responses compared to other methods like interviews where social desirability bias might come into play.
3. Standardization: Questionnaires ensure that each respondent receives the same set of questions in the same format, providing consistency in data collection and analysis.
4. Quantitative Data: Questionnaires can yield quantitative data that can be analyzed statistically to identify patterns, trends, and correlations within the responses.
In contrast, an interview might be time-consuming and limited in scope, while a rating scale and a schedule might not provide the depth of information needed to study the prospects of a political party comprehensively in an urban area.
Here's why a questionnaire is a suitable choice:
1. Scalability: Questionnaires can be distributed to a large number of people in the urban area, allowing the researcher to gather a wide range of opinions and perspectives efficiently.
2. Anonymity: Respondents can provide their opinions anonymously through a questionnaire, which can lead to more honest and candid responses compared to other methods like interviews where social desirability bias might come into play.
3. Standardization: Questionnaires ensure that each respondent receives the same set of questions in the same format, providing consistency in data collection and analysis.
4. Quantitative Data: Questionnaires can yield quantitative data that can be analyzed statistically to identify patterns, trends, and correlations within the responses.
In contrast, an interview might be time-consuming and limited in scope, while a rating scale and a schedule might not provide the depth of information needed to study the prospects of a political party comprehensively in an urban area.
