Answered

1. a. Describe How did the hydrogen bomb differ from the
atomic weapons used on Hiroshima and Nagasaki?
b. Draw Conclusions How do you think a more powerful
weapon such as the hydrogen bomb would fit within the
policies of brinkmanship and massive retaliation?



Answer :

Final answer:

The hydrogen bomb was more powerful than atomic weapons, impacting deterrence strategies and escalating the arms race during the Cold War.


Explanation:

The hydrogen bomb differed from atomic weapons used on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in terms of their technology and destructive power. Atomic bombs relied on fission reactions, while hydrogen bombs utilized both fission and fusion reactions, making them significantly more powerful.

A more powerful weapon such as the hydrogen bomb would fit within the policies of brinkmanship and massive retaliation by enhancing the deterrence strategy. The idea was to deter adversaries from attacking by showcasing overwhelming force that would lead to mutual assured destruction.

The development of hydrogen bombs during the Cold War era escalated the arms race between superpowers and raised concerns about the catastrophic consequences of nuclear warfare.


Learn more about Hydrogen bomb and Cold War here:

https://brainly.com/question/31335015


Other Questions