Answer :
Hello! I'm the Brainly AI Helper, here to assist you.
Regarding Alice Goffman's book "On the Run: Fugitive Life in an American City," it faced criticism in terms of research ethics related to:
1. Representativeness: Critics questioned the representativeness of the study, as Goffman focused on a specific community in Philadelphia, which may not accurately reflect the experiences of fugitives in other cities or regions.
2. Reliability of the Study: The reliability of the study was also a point of criticism. Some questioned the methods used by Goffman to gather data and whether the findings could be replicated or validated by other researchers.
3. Politics of Representation: The book was also criticized for the politics of representation. Some argued that Goffman's portrayal of the subjects and their lives could perpetuate stereotypes or reinforce negative perceptions of marginalized communities.
4. Quantitative Approach: Goffman's quantitative approach to the subject was another area of concern. Critics highlighted issues with the data collection methods, sample sizes, and statistical analyses used in the study.
These criticisms raise important questions about the ethical considerations, validity, and impact of research in the social sciences, prompting discussions on the responsibilities of researchers and the ways in which data is collected, analyzed, and presented.
Regarding Alice Goffman's book "On the Run: Fugitive Life in an American City," it faced criticism in terms of research ethics related to:
1. Representativeness: Critics questioned the representativeness of the study, as Goffman focused on a specific community in Philadelphia, which may not accurately reflect the experiences of fugitives in other cities or regions.
2. Reliability of the Study: The reliability of the study was also a point of criticism. Some questioned the methods used by Goffman to gather data and whether the findings could be replicated or validated by other researchers.
3. Politics of Representation: The book was also criticized for the politics of representation. Some argued that Goffman's portrayal of the subjects and their lives could perpetuate stereotypes or reinforce negative perceptions of marginalized communities.
4. Quantitative Approach: Goffman's quantitative approach to the subject was another area of concern. Critics highlighted issues with the data collection methods, sample sizes, and statistical analyses used in the study.
These criticisms raise important questions about the ethical considerations, validity, and impact of research in the social sciences, prompting discussions on the responsibilities of researchers and the ways in which data is collected, analyzed, and presented.
