Answer :
The grounds for appealing a case to a higher court according to the Federal Judiciary Act are:
1. The losing side believes that the state law used against them is invalid according to the US Constitution. This means that if the losing party in a case feels that the state law applied during the trial goes against the principles or rights outlined in the US Constitution, they can appeal to a higher court for a review of the decision.
2. The winning side believes that the outcome of the trial could lead to amending the US Constitution. In this scenario, the winning party may have concerns that the decision reached in the lower court could set a precedent that contradicts or undermines the principles of the US Constitution. As a result, they may seek to appeal the case to a higher court to ensure constitutional integrity.
3. The losing side finds new evidence that might change the outcome of a trial. If new evidence surfaces after the initial trial that was not presented before, and this evidence could potentially alter the outcome of the case significantly, the losing party can appeal to a higher court based on the grounds of introducing new evidence that could impact the original decision.
These are the key grounds outlined in the Federal Judiciary Act that would warrant appealing a case to a higher court. Each scenario presents a different reason for seeking review by a higher judicial body.
1. The losing side believes that the state law used against them is invalid according to the US Constitution. This means that if the losing party in a case feels that the state law applied during the trial goes against the principles or rights outlined in the US Constitution, they can appeal to a higher court for a review of the decision.
2. The winning side believes that the outcome of the trial could lead to amending the US Constitution. In this scenario, the winning party may have concerns that the decision reached in the lower court could set a precedent that contradicts or undermines the principles of the US Constitution. As a result, they may seek to appeal the case to a higher court to ensure constitutional integrity.
3. The losing side finds new evidence that might change the outcome of a trial. If new evidence surfaces after the initial trial that was not presented before, and this evidence could potentially alter the outcome of the case significantly, the losing party can appeal to a higher court based on the grounds of introducing new evidence that could impact the original decision.
These are the key grounds outlined in the Federal Judiciary Act that would warrant appealing a case to a higher court. Each scenario presents a different reason for seeking review by a higher judicial body.
