Answer :
The excerpt from the Bill of Rights of 1689 criticizes absolutism by stating that the purported power to suspend laws or dispense with them without Parliament's consent is illegal. This shows a clear opposition to the absolute authority of the monarchy, highlighting the importance of parliamentary consent in governing.
The signers of the document defend the institution of Parliament because it represents a system of checks and balances where decisions are made collectively, involving representatives of the people. By limiting the monarch's power and emphasizing the role of Parliament, they aimed to prevent any individual, such as the king, from having unchecked authority.
In modern times, the significance of this document lies in its influence on the development of constitutional monarchy and the protection of individual rights. It serves as a historical precedent for the separation of powers, the rule of law, and the importance of democratic principles. The Bill of Rights of 1689 paved the way for establishing limits on government power and safeguarding civil liberties, principles that continue to shape contemporary legal and political systems.
The signers of the document defend the institution of Parliament because it represents a system of checks and balances where decisions are made collectively, involving representatives of the people. By limiting the monarch's power and emphasizing the role of Parliament, they aimed to prevent any individual, such as the king, from having unchecked authority.
In modern times, the significance of this document lies in its influence on the development of constitutional monarchy and the protection of individual rights. It serves as a historical precedent for the separation of powers, the rule of law, and the importance of democratic principles. The Bill of Rights of 1689 paved the way for establishing limits on government power and safeguarding civil liberties, principles that continue to shape contemporary legal and political systems.