Answer :
Answer:
hello
Explanation:
Implied powers are easier to challenge than expressed powers.
Because :
- Implied Powers: these are not explicitly stated but are derived from the expressed powers through interpretation. Because they are based on the necessity and proper clause (or similar legal principles), they often require interpretation and justification. This inherent flexibility and reliance on interpretation make implied powers more susceptible to challenge. Critics can argue that such powers overstep the boundaries of the expressed powers and are not justified or necessary.
- Expressed Powers: these are explicitly stated in the Constitution or legal documents, leaving little room for interpretation or dispute. Because they are clearly defined, challenging them requires addressing the explicit language and intent of the constitutional or legal text.
