3. Consider the following statements about artifacts as a source of history and identify the incorrect one.

A. Artifacts are studied by archaeologists.
B. Artifacts can tell us about the religious practices of people in the past.
C. Artifacts include human and animal bones and the remains of plants.
D. Artifacts can tell us whether India traded with China in the past.

4. Which of these would you call a manuscript? Why?

I. A message from the ruler carved on stone
II. A message from the ruler hand-written on a palm leaf
III. A poem written on a thin sheet of copper
IV. A text engraved on the walls of a temple

A. Options I and II, because both are messages from the ruler.
B. Options I and IV, because both are written on stone.
C. Option II and III, because they are hand-written.
D. Option III, because it is written on a copper sheet.



Answer :

Final answer:

Artefacts hold valuable historical information and can reveal insights on past civilizations, while a manuscript refers to a handwritten document on a specific material.


Explanation:

Artefacts are objects of historical significance that are studied by archaeologists to learn about past civilizations. Artefacts can provide insights into various aspects of ancient societies, such as religious practices, trade relations, and daily life. For example, studying pottery shards or inscriptions on objects can reveal details about trading routes and connections between civilizations.

A manuscript is a handwritten document. In the context provided, option ii (A message from the ruler hand-written on palm leaf) would be considered a manuscript because it is a message written by hand on a specific material, reflecting the ancient form of written communication.


Learn more about Studying Artefacts and Manuscripts in History here:

https://brainly.com/question/37962918


Other Questions